In the series: Note 4.

Version: 0.3

By: Albert van der Sel

Doc. Number: Note 4.

For who: for beginners.

Remark: Please refresh the page to see any updates.

Status: Ready.

Maybe you need to pick up "some" basic "mathematics" rather

So really..., my emphasis is on "rather

So, I am really not sure of it, but I hope that this note can be of use.

Ofcourse, I hope you like my "style" and try the note anyway.

Preceding notes:

Note 1: Basic Arithmetic.

Note 2: Linear Equations.

Note 3: Quadratic Equations.

This note: Note 4: The Sine and Cosine functions.

Each note in this series, is build "on top" of the preceding ones. If you are not familiar with, for example,

"linear equations" in the form of "y=ax+b", then it's highly recommended to read Note 2 first.

If you are not familiar with, quadratic equations" in the form of "y=ax

then it's highly recommended to read Note 3 first.

In fact I am sure that this note "works", if you are at least at the level represented by notes 2 and 3.

and some important "trigonometric functions" like the "sin(x)" and "cos(x)" functions.

Yes, we are going to explain those functions here, so that you are able to use them, and understand the theory.

The sine (wave) "function" is often visible in

exibits a "wave-like" nature, which can be expressed mathematically as sine functions.

Also much closer to home, you can see 'sine-like' phenomena, like AC electrical signals, or waves in all sorts of media,

or making of pure musical notes with instruments, the vibration of snares etc.. etc..

When "something" vibrates, it does that with a certain

can also be expressed by a sine function.

There are many excellent pictures and animations on the Internet, but they are not always free and in the public domain.

However, the simple picture in figure 1 is. And it will do nicely.

Suppose you have a pendulum. At the bottom end, you attach a pen, or pin, of some sort. This pin, can draw

a line on a sheet of paper. This paper moves in a uniform (constant) speed.

Suppose that the pendulum was at rest first. Next, you displace it sideways from its resting position, and

let it go. It will start swinging from one side to the other opposite site.

Now, what is drawn on the paper, is a great example of a

As you know from experience, at the lowest point, the pendulum has it's maximum speed. Then, when it start to climb,

it's velocity decreases, until it reaches it's maximum displacement where the speed is "0", and then the motion is reversed.

Figure 1.

The animation in figure 2 is instructive too. Here you see a uniform circular motion. The object in "orbit"

moves with a constant velocity around the center of a circle.

Note that there is another point too, moving along the vertical axis.

That point is the projection of the object in "orbit", along the vertical axis, and note how it exactly

mimics the movement of a pendulum.

Figure 2.

Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sinus-visualisation.gif

For the point occilating on the vertical axis: if we would mount a pin on it, and we let a sheet of paper

move to the right (with a uniform speed), we would get a sine wave on paper again.

Here is an example of a sine function, plotted in the (usual) XY coordinate system.

Figure 3. An example of a sin function.

If the pendulum was swinging much faster, the peaks and crests were much closer together. On the other hand,

if the frequency was much lower, there was more distance between the peaks and crests.

In the preceding notes on linear equations (lines) and quadratic equations (parabola), we were used to

plot the functions in the (usual) XY coordinate system.

However, one might also say that the

should be plotted against

Look again at figure 1. As the paper moves (and the pedulum moves), the paper "registers" the position of the

pendulum with respect to time. The figure on the paper really tells us,

So that's why, for example physicists, replace the "y" of the "y-axis" with "displacement" (or amplitude),

and the "x" of the "x-axis" with "t" of time.

That's not really fundamentally different. Once upon a time, mathematicians choose the represent the axes by "y" and "x",

but it could also have been, in a manner of speaking, by the "v" and "w" axes. There is no fundamental difference here.

The figure below shows us

the usual integers as 1,2,3 etc..

However, when talking about sin() and cos() functions, the number "π" plays a very important role.

The two figures below, are equivalent. But, in the lower figure, I explicitly showed "π" as well.

The number "π" will be explained in section 2.

Figure 4. y=sin(x).

which we simply will write as

Note that if "r" is the radius, then "2r" is the diameter of a circle.

It's not so strange, that the circumference

However, although the "formula" 2πr is not really complicated, it sure is not easy to proof!

The number "π" has puzzled lots of people (at least as early as 1600 BC). It was indeed found, a long time ago,

that the

That is: "circumference : diameter" = 2πr / 2r = π

All sorts of nifty approximation methods were used, and it was found that the value

of π is very close to 3.14, but that's only an approximation.

As an example: suppose you need to calculate the circumference of a circle which has a radius of 2 meters,

then the circumference = 2 x 3.14 x 2 = 6.28 x 2 = 12.56 m.

In many cases, like the simple example above, the approximation of "3.14" is good enough.

However, we must keep in mind that for many scientific- and enginering implementations,

a higher precision is required.

Although you cannot say that it is really "mysterious", the decimal representation of the fraction ".14" in "3.14...",

actually never ends, and you can try to be more and more precise, without end.

Today, high-end supercomputers have calculated the value of "pi" to many, many, thousends of digits (behind the "dot", or "comma").

Although a circle (or sphere) is a common object, it really stands out in having "complete symmetry".

Do you know of any other geometrical object, where you can draw a line through any point of the circumference,

and the center, which will always splits it in two equal parts?

For all socalled "harmonic oscillators", which vibrate or move with a fixed periodicy (frequency), we can say

that they can be described by a sine (or cosine function), or a "sum" of such functions.

By the way, in a moment we will see that the sine and cosine are actually equal, except for a phase difference.

What ever

However, first we need to review a (sort of) "formal definition of the sine and cosine functions.

Figure 5.

In the figure above, you a circle on the left side, with radius "r". When you "project" r on the x-axis,

you get the blue piece of line (along the x-axis). Let's call that piece of line "a".

When you "project" r on the y-axis, you get the red piece of line, but this time shown on the right.

Let's call that piece of line "b".

Note that we have right-angled triangle, enclosed by "r", "a" and "b".

Note also that we have an angle, let's call it "α", between "r" and "a".

In the figure above, we see the formal definitions of sin(α) and cos(α):

sin(α)= |
b - r |

cos(α)= |
a - r |

Note that "an angle keeps the same value", no matter how much we "inflate" the triangle.

So, even if all the sides are 10 times as long, the only thing that matters is the relative ratio

between the sides.

For example: sin(α) = b/r = 10b/10r = 99b/99r = 0.2b/ 0.2r etc.. etc...

Now, if r=1, then we get very simple formula's:

If you say: "I still don't see the connection with the sine graph examples...", then I don't blame you.

But here it comes:

In the circle, on the y-axis, you might note the "green" dot. Just picture the green dot in motion, just

as we have shown in figure 2.

That is, the green dot mimics the pendulum movement, en swings along the y-axis, up and down, just as a pendulum would do.

Actually, as we saw in figure 2, it's the orange dot which moves along the circle with a uniform speed.

This makes the projection (the green dot) "act" like a pendulum.

Now, attention please!

Every time the green dot (or orange dot) changes position, then the length of a or b changes too.

Let's focus on "b" for a moment. When the green dot is in the Origin then b=0. But as the green dot moves up,

b get's longer, or in other words "sin(α)" get larger, all the way up to "1", when the green dot has

it's maximum. Then the green dot starts moving downwards, en b=sin(α) get smaller.

When the green dot is in the Origin again, b=0. But the green dot keeps decending, meaning that b get's a negative value,

all the way "down" to "-1". Then, the green dot starts moving up again etc.. etc..

Now, please take a look again at figure 4 (and you may ignore the values on the x-axis for a moment).

Would't you agree that the value of the length of "b", is reflected in the curve, as time passes, "moving"

from the value "0" to "+1" then moving to "0" again, all the way down to "-1", and then starts "to climb" again etc.. etc..

Since sin(α) = b (if r=1), we also may say that we have a curve (or function) notated by "sin(α)".

But what do have on the x-axis on such a curve? Angles?. Yes that is true, so we have for example 30 degrees, 90 degrees etc..

However, mathematically, we often have the numbers 1,2,3 etc.. on the x-axis. So is that a conflict?

No, you may list a (continuus) range of angles on the x-axis, from 0 degrees to 360 degrees.

Or, you may use the usual numbers. However, that does not look "very nice", but it is still correct.

This is why people often arrange fractions of "π" along the x-axis, as is shown in figure 4, the lower figure.

In a moment, more on this.

Now what about "a"? Above, we have seen the story of "b". Indeed for "a", a similar story holds.

This time, you need to imaging a "green dot" going continuously from left to right.

However, there is a small "phase difference" between both stories.

If the green dot is in the Origin, then b=0, but a is at it's maximum, namely "1". This is so since "r"

lies completely along the x-axis, and thus the blue line segment "a" coincides with "r".

Then, suppose the the green dot moves upwards, making "a" smaller. When the green dot is at it's maximum,

then "a" is 0 (while b=1).

etc.. etc..

Since a=cos(α), the sine and cosine functions are identical, but the cosine is a small phase "ahead"

compared to the sine function.

It's very instructive to see the (standard) sine and cosine curves, in one figure:

Figure 6. sin(x) and cos(x)

I still have to explain the values along the x-axis.

Since we started by using the sine of an "angle", like "sin(α)", you may ofcourse divide the x-axis in degrees (from 0 to 360).

You may also divide the x-axis using the ordinary numbers like 1, 2, 3 etc..

But where is the "match"? This will be explained in section 2.3.

Note that figure 6, shows us just

Since the pendulum keeps swinging (if we ignore all frictions), then the sine and cosine functions

will repeat the "period" over and over again.

upward, counterclock wise. Ofcourse, that dot follows the circle. There comes a brief moment, where the "arc"

on the circle, has a length of 1 too (equal to "r"). Only for a smart moment ofcourse, since the orange dot is in motion and the

length of the arc increases continuously.

It's really quite special when the arc-length is 1 too, and thus (at that moment, equal to "r")

It happes when α is about 57.3 degrees.

The remarkable thing is, is that if we perform "π x 57.3 = 3.14 x 57.3" we get 180 degrees.

(remember, &960; is about 3.14).

Expressed in such way, by agreement, people often say that at 180 degrees, we are at π

This is one reason why people also often say:

If we start from the point (1,0) on the x-axis, and:

- we rotate 90 degrees counterclock wise, we are at 90 degrees or π/2 (or π/2 rad) .

- we rotate 180 degrees counterclock wise, we are at 180 degrees or π (or π rad).

- we rotate 270 degrees counterclock wise, we are at 270 degrees or 3/2π (or 3/2 π rad).

- we rotate 360 degrees counterclock wise, we are at 360 degrees (or 0 degrees) or 2π (or 2π rad).

If you are going to do a lot of math with trigonometric functions, it's probably a good thing to remember

the following table:

degrees: | π rad: |

45 | π/4 |

60 | π/3 |

90 | π/2 |

180 | π |

270 | 3π/2 |

360 | 2π |

Let's now plot the standard sine function, using a few numbers, degrees, radians on the x-axis.

Figure 7. Different scales on the x-axis (numbers, degrees, radians)

In figure 7, we have three different "representations" of the possible "x-values": numbers, degrees, radians.

- Sure, you might use "common" numbers on the x-axis, like (1,2,3,5, etc..), but since π is 3.14, you might as well

put in π/2, π, 3/2 π, and 2π too. We also know that these corrspond to 90, 180, 270, and 360 degrees (in that order).

- Sure, you might use degrees on the x-axis, from 0 to 360 for one Period. But then you might as well

put in π/2, π, 3/2 π, and 2π too. We know that these simply corrspond to 90, 180, 270, and 360 degrees (in that order).

I am sure that it will amaze you, how completely different it "looks", compared to the "nice" periodic sine and cosine functions.

Just as we did with the sin() and cos(), let's collect all formal definitions here:

Please remeber that the definitions refer to a right-angled triangle, enclosed by "r", "a" and "b".

Otherwise, if needed, please take a look at figure 5. again.

Here are the definitions:

sin(α)= |
b - r |

cos(α)= |
a - r |

tan(α)= |
sin(α) ---- cos(α) |

Or, we can also write that as: tan(α) = sin(α) / cos(α) = b / a

Looking at the moving orange dot (in figure 5), moving counterclock wise along the circle, we know that the sides "a" and "b",

both vary between -1 and +1. If "b" = 0, then simply tan(α)=0. However, if "a" gets nearer and nearer to 0, then

tan(α) tends to diverge to an infinite high value.

The figure below shows you the standard tangent function. Note how it diverges (goes to infinity) in the close vincinity

of various points.

Figure 8. Standard tangent function.

Note that, for example if x=π then sin(π) is "0" and thus tan(π) is "0".

However, if x=1/2 π, then cos(1/2 π) = "0", meaning that tan(1/2 π) is "not defined", meaning going to infinity.

I will make it plausible, that if "n" increases, the function will "oscillate" faster.

Figure 4 shows you the standard f(x)=sin(x) function. For x=π, then f(x)=sin(π)=0.

You can also check that with figure 4.

Now, suppose we have the function g(x)=sin(2x). Now, already for x= 1/2 π, then g(x)=sin(2 * 1/2 π)=sin(π)=0.

So, already for "x is half pi", we have that g(x) is "0". It seems that g(x) ocillates twice as fast as the standard sin(x).

This will be explained more thourougly in the "task" below.

Now take a look at figure 10. Here we see the functions sin(2x), sin(3x), and sin(4x) compared to sin(x).

Figure 10. The sin() function with different "frequencies".

How fast a sin(nx) function ocillates, is expressed in how many "periods" fit in the interval [0,π].

The "more" periods fit, it also said that the higher it's "frequency" is.

The following excercise will explain this better:

Task: plot the function y = 3 sin(2x)

Maybe this task looks difficult at first sight.

No, it's really quite easy. First, I am not going to plot anything here.

I will only use a small bit of logic.

I say that "sin(2x)" is simply 2x denser in peaks and crests, compared to the standard "sin(x)".

You know, for example from figure 4, that sin(x) has it's first peak at π/2, and it's first crest at π.

Now look what happens:

For sin(2x) those first peaks and crests are happening much "earlier". Look at sin (2 x π/4) = sin(π/2).

That means, if we try π/4 for "sin(2x)", we get the same as sin(π/2).

So, sin(2x) gets it's first peak already at

Similar reasoning holds for the other peaks and crests.

will fit in one period of sin(x).

So, what would happen with sin(3x)? Then 3 periods of sin(3x) will fit in one period of sin(x).

Thus, if you would look at sin(

And "n" periods of sin(

It's completely the other way around if "n" would be a fraction.

If we would have a "fraction", that is something like sin(1/2 x), or sin(1/3 x), then those functions

are more "stretched" compared to the standard "sin(x)" function.

For example, 3 standard "sin(x)" periods, will fit into one period of "sin(1/3 x).

Just as with any other function, this has only an effect on the "amplitude" or values of y.

It does not have an effect on the rate of oscillations (or periods).

For example, sin(x) (or sin(2x) for that matter), has a maximum value of "y=1", for some values of x.

The "3" in "y =

So the max value of "y =

In the end, it's very simple to determine how a function like "y =

Suppose further that:

r = 2

a = 1.73

b = 1

The angle α between the side r and a is 30 degrees

Task: Calculate sin(α) and cos(α).

sin(α)= b/r = 1/2 = 0.5

cos(α)= a/r = 1.73/2 = 0.87

Ofcourse, if you have a calculator, you could have typed in sin(30) and cos(30), and obtained the result immediately.

Also, if you have accurate graphs of the sine- and cosine curves, then you could have read the results from

the graphs, by finding the "y-values" at x=30 degrees.

Suppose further that:

r = 5

a = 3

b = 4

Task: Calculate sin(α) and cos(α). Also, determine the angle α between r and a.

At this point, we do not know angle α, but we sure can calculate sin(α) and cos(α),

since we know the values of a, b, and r.

So:

sin(α)= b/r = 4/5 = 0.8

cos(α)= a/r = 3/5 = 0.6

Ok, we have the sine and cosine values. To get the angle, we could use the sin

the

So, we are not going to use that method, yet. So, what now?

Having a accurate graph of the sine function, then where y=sin(x)=0.8, we find an angle of about 54 degrees.

Or, there also exists tables which lists the sin, cosine, tangent, for every single degree from 0 to 360.

Is that old-fashioned? Absolutely, but it works.

but we know the angle between "a" and "r", the we can calculate "a" from the cosine of the angle.

Here is an example:

See figure 9. Suppose we know "r", "b", and the angle. But not "a". Can we still derive it?

Figure 9. Standard tangent function.

So, suppose:

r = 2

a = unknown

b = 1

The angle α between the side r and a, is 30 degrees. We need to find "a".

We know (or we can calculate) that cos(30)= 0.87. Thus:

cos(30) = 0.87 = a/r = a/2

Thus a = 2 x 0.87 = 1.74

So we have found the length of side "a", since we knew "r" and the angle between "r" and "a".

Note:

You might also say: I just use "Pythagorean theorem" here. Yes, that works too.

If you know the lenght of 2 sides of a right-angled triangle, you can always calculate the unknown one.

So, a

Filling the values of "r" and "b":

a

At any moment, the sides "a", "b" and "r", define a right-angled triangle, for which the "Pythagorean theorem" holds:

a

Since:

sin(α)= b/r

cos(α)= a/r

then it follows that b=rsin(α) and a=rcos(α)

Thus:

(rcos(α))

r

And we may eliminate the r

cos(α)

Which is usually written as:

I will refer to that equation in a later note, so that's why I already mention it here.

Mathematically, we talk about functions like sin(x) or sin(5x) etc...

So, like always up to now, we usually talk of a function of the variable "x".

If you then look at sin(nx) or cos(nx) graphs, it seems as if they are like a "snapshots" in time.

A physical system, on the other hand, is dynamic. In reality, any point on the "x-axis",

has a displacement which varies continuously with

that you can see in figure 2.

So, the displacement

For a certain fixed point (but it can be any point), we know that it's displacement along the "y-axis"

can be described by sin(nt). Note that we focus here on the "sine", but we could just as easily have choosen "cosine".

The "n" in "sin(nt)" is tied to the property of how fast it "oscillates". We are almost there!

It's only logical to try to "link" that "n" to the physical properties of that system.

So, we have for a certain point:

But it's "amplitude" (max displacement), does not have to be "1", and it can be any value "A". So:

The value "n" must have some sort of a direct link with the "frequency", as we have seen in a former section.

This is indeed possible. That "n" must be related to the frequency in a physical sense (often called "f"),

and it is: 2 π f. So we may write:

So, we are done here. Well, yes, but usually, the function f(t) is expressed in something

that's called "angular" velocity.

If you look at figure 2 again, the point on the circle, has a "uniform" motion, with a constant speed.

Suppose the "period" of completing one full circle is "T" seconds.

The circumference (or distance) of completing one full circle in "T" seconds is "2πr".

If T is short, then the frequency is high. And, if T is long, then the frequenct is low.

So, suppose T=5, then it takes 5 seconds to complete the whole cicle once. Note that 1/5=0.2.

Suppose T=0.2, then it only takes 0.2 seconds to complete the whole cicle once. Note that 1/0.2=5.

Indeed, the following relation exists between "T" and "f":

f= | 1 - T |

Now, the angular velocity "ω", is a measure "how much angle" has been covered (between the radius and the x-axis),

for the particle that does the circular motion, does in a certain time.

Since the motion is uniform, that is constant, we can just as well take the "complete angle", that is the circle,

or "2π. It covers that in "T" seconds. So, ω is:

ω = | 2π --- T |

Thus ω = 2πf

So, finally we can write:

The next note is a super quick intro on how to differentiate, and differential equations.